Andrew S · In the Library · Language · Non-Fiction · Quick Read! · Writing

How to Write a Sentence | by Stanley Fish

How to Write a Sentence

How to Write a Sentence: And How to Read One by Stanley Fish
(Harper, 2011, 165 pages)

Stanley Fish makes big claims for the potential of well composed sentences. “They promise nothing less than lessons and practice in the organization of the world” (7). He claims that writing and enjoying a well written sentence is not a matter of simply memorizing and following grammatical rules, but rather, of grasping and practicing some basic forms that are common to many well-structured sentences. Practicing how to write good sentences, understanding sentence structure, and appreciating effective sentences are all tied up together. Fish communicates this in a pithy formula: “Sentence craft equals sentence comprehension equals sentence appreciation” (11).

Fish insists that mastering the basic forms that sentences come in is more important (at least initially) to good writing than the content of the sentences themselves. If you don’t know how to communicate something, the content of what you’re communicating won’t matter much. Fish offers the examples of the subordinating style (which ranks, orders, and sequences its contents in a highly organized way), the additive style (which adds one thought after another in a more informal style), and the satiric style (which is harder to define, but still tied to forms). These different styles are illustrated by sentences from great writers like Martin Luther King, Jr., Gertrude Stein, and Oscar Wilde. Fish then breaks down how these sentences are formed to show a structure that can be imitated and appropriated. This is stated in the form of a personal “theology”: “You shall tie yourself to forms and the forms shall set you free” (33). The content of a sentence is ultimately the point, but you can’t make that point unless you first master the forms.

In addition to being a guide to writing, the book functions as a primer on rhetoric and an introduction to literary criticism. The two chapters that deal with first and last sentences – focusing on what novelists can do with the first and last sentence of a book – are guides to and examples of meditative reading, turning sentences over until every sense has been drawn of them. The book may not be for everyone. I can see how it could come off as the kind of over-analysis that kills the joke or ruins the mood. However, I find Fish’s emphasis on intuiting the logical structure of sentences over memorizing grammatical rules very helpful. He uses excellent examples – I particularly enjoyed the sentences he included from John Donne and Anthony Powell – and his love of good writing is contagious.

In the Library · Language · Non-Fiction · Ying L

The Secret Life of Pronouns | by James W. Pennebaker

The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us by James W. Pennebaker
(Bloomsbury Press, 2011, 352 pages)

A research book on pronouns? Really? I had my doubts when I picked up this book from our new book display. It’s not a quick read for sure, but I enjoyed it. Pennebaker, a psychology professor at the University of Texas at Austin, has been using computer programs to count and categorize language over the past 20 years. This new interdisciplinary field is called computational linguistics.  Here is the definition from our SCC Library’s Oxford Reference’s New Oxford American Dictionary Online Version 2012:

Computational linguistics: the branch of linguistics in which the techniques of computer science are applied to the analysis and synthesis of language and speech.

Pennebaker wrote this book based on his studies on function words. Function words are grammatical words that hold sentences together – words such as: I, You, He, This, That, The, An and And. Pennebaker states that function words are not just the filler words that we don’t pay attention to; they are the ones that can help us better understand relationships between speakers, objects and other people. Pennebaker presents numerous interesting projects and examples that we all can relate to.  By counting the frequency of function words we use, Pennebaker and his colleagues and graduate students analyze written documents, conversations, tweets and many other language formats to uncover surprising insights.

Pennebaker discusses Craigslist advertisements, high school seniors’ admission essays and the argument between Elisabeth Hasselbeck and Rosie O’Donnell on the TV show The View. Many of his findings are fascinating. In some communities, people use similar language style; the more similar the community’s use of language, the more cohesive the city. Would you have predicted that the high school seniors who use too many verbs in their admission essays are likely to make lower grades in college?  You’ll have to find out the analysis on The View argument between the two hostesses yourself ;-). Another interesting case study is the use of first-person singular pronouns in press conferences among the United States’ presidents. Pennebaker also describes applications and tools used by law enforcement agencies. The chapters on linguistic fingerprinting and author identification are intriguing readings, too. It’s an informative and stimulating read.